Aurélia Peyrical has written to us about a two-day German-French philosophy conference she is co-organizing with Lea Gekle.

Here’s a PDF of the program. Time zone: CEST

And here’s the detail:

To register, email Lea Gekle (lea.gekle@u-picardie.fr). A summary of each presentation (1 page) will be available this week-end in German and French for those who register. It will also be possible to take part in the discussion in English, as well as in German and French. Two extraordinary translators will help us manage to ensure that everyone feels at ease to participate. 

English: This two-day conference intends to throw light upon doctoral students / post-doc student’s current research conducted in Germany and France, working in the area of German Critical Theory (first and second generation) from a philosophical and also interdisciplinary point of view. “Interdisciplinarity” has now become somewhat of a buzzword in Europe. On the face of it, the term mostly refers to a certain idea of how disciplines are supposed to come to work with one another. But, in fact, the term has for some time now been quite often used as a part of the neoliberal narrative that accompanies the Bologna Process’s standardization and re-structuring of European university systems. Accumulating knowledge is, however, only one way of thinking about interdisciplinary. Disciplines are themselves complex bodies of knowledge that cannot simply be “linked” to others from the outside. Hence our question: what kind of interdisciplinarity does Critical Theory need in order to be able to formulate at the same time a contemporary critical theory of society ?

French: Ces deux journées d’étude visent à mettre en lumière les travaux en cours de doctorant-e-s et jeunes docteur-e-s allemand-e-s et français-e-s travaillant sur la théorie critique d’un point de vue philosophique mais dans une perspective interdisciplinaire. L’interdisciplinarité est, désormais, sur toutes les lèvres. Mais elle est la plupart du temps évoquée dans un cadre particulier qui ne dit pas son nom : celui du processus de Bologne et de la restructuration néolibérale des universités européennes. Contre ce type d’interdisciplinarité qui se pense en tant qu’accumulation de différents savoirs sans se soucier de la manière de les articuler, nous nous posons la question suivante : comment penser aujourd’hui, grâce à la Théorie Critique, une interdisciplinarité et une pluridisciplinarité qui ne soit pas un flatus vocis formaliste, mais dont l’approche inter- et pluri-disciplinaire permet l’esquisse d’une théorie sociale contemporaine véritablement critique ?